Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on liver cancer management (CERO-19)

Background & Aims: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems and it may have heavily impacted patients with liver cancer (LC). Herein, we evaluated whether the schedule of LC screening or procedures has been interrupted or delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An international survey evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practice and clinical trials from March 2020 to June 2020, as the first phase of a multicentre, international, and observational project. The focus was on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, cared for around the world during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave. Results: Ninety-one centres expressed interest to participate and 76 were included in the analysis, from Europe, South America, North America, Asia, and Africa (73.7%,17.1%, 5.3%, 2.6%, and 1.3% per continent, respectively). Eighty-seven percent of the centres modified their clinical practice: 40.8% the diagnostic procedures, 80.9% the screening programme, 50% cancelled curative and/or palliative treatments for LC, and 41.7% modified the liver transplantation programme. Forty-five out of 69 (65.2%) centres in which clinical trials were running modified their treatments in that setting, but 58.1% were able to recruit new patients. The phone call service was modified in 51.4% of centres which had this service before the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 19/37). Conclusions: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a tremendous impact on the routine care of patients with liver cancer. Modifications in screening, diagnostic, and treatment algorithms may have significantly impaired the outcome of patients. Ongoing data collection and future analyses will report the benefits and disadvantages of the strategies implemented, aiding future decision-making. Lay summary: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems globally. Herein, we assessed the impact of the first wave pandemic on patients with liver cancer and found that routine care for these patients has been majorly disrupted, which could have a significant impact on outcomes. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)

Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on liver cancer management (CERO-19).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems and it may have heavily impacted patients with liver cancer (LC). Herein, we evaluated whether the schedule of LC screening or procedures has been interrupted or delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An international survey evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practice and clinical trials from March 2020 to June 2020, as the first phase of a multicentre, international, and observational project. The focus was on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, cared for around the world during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave. RESULTS: Ninety-one centres expressed interest to participate and 76 were included in the analysis, from Europe, South America, North America, Asia, and Africa (73.7%, 17.1%, 5.3%, 2.6%, and 1.3% per continent, respectively). Eighty-seven percent of the centres modified their clinical practice: 40.8% the diagnostic procedures, 80.9% the screening programme, 50% cancelled curative and/or palliative treatments for LC, and 41.7% modified the liver transplantation programme. Forty-five out of 69 (65.2%) centres in which clinical trials were running modified their treatments in that setting, but 58.1% were able to recruit new patients. The phone call service was modified in 51.4% of centres which had this service before the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 19/37). CONCLUSIONS: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a tremendous impact on the routine care of patients with liver cancer. Modifications in screening, diagnostic, and treatment algorithms may have significantly impaired the outcome of patients. Ongoing data collection and future analyses will report the benefits and disadvantages of the strategies implemented, aiding future decision-making. LAY SUMMARY: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems globally. Herein, we assessed the impact of the first wave pandemic on patients with liver cancer and found that routine care for these patients has been majorly disrupted, which could have a significant impact on outcomes

Análise dos tratamentos realizados em pacientes portadores de carcinoma hepatocelular acompanhados em um hospital federal do Rio de Janeiro

Objetivos: Existem poucos estudos sobre a epidemiologia do carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC) e suas diferentes modalidades terapêuticas no Brasil. A falta de informações sobre o CHC no Brasil dificulta a política de saúde na prevenção e tratamento de novos casos. O objetivo desse trabalho foi caracterizar o CHC segundo os seus principais aspectos clínicos e epidemiológicos, as modalidades de tratamento, e os desfechos após o tratamento em um hospital geral no Brasil. Métodos: Foram acompanhados 326 pacientes com diagnóstico de CHC durante um período de cinco anos (de janeiro de 2011 a dezembro de 2015). Foram analisados os dados demográficos, as principais características da doença hepática de base e do tumor, os tratamentos e os desfechos. A sobrevida também foi avaliada. Resultados: De acordo com a classificação de Barcelona, a maior parte dos pacientes (114) foi classificada como BCLC A no momento do diagnóstico. A quimioembolização hepática transarterial (TACE) foi o tratamento de escolha em 173 (53%) pacientes. A terapia sistêmica com sorafenibe foi realizada em 130 (40.2%) indivíduos, o transplante de fígado em 44 (13.5%), a ressecção do tumor em 26 (8%), a ablação por radiofrequência em 10 (3.1%) e a alcoolização em 5 (1.5%). Em 14 (5%) pacientes apenas cuidados paliativos. A média de sobrevida global foi de 20 meses a partir da data do diagnóstico até a data do óbito ou do último contato. Com relação ao grupo submetido a TACE, a sobrevida global foi de 22 meses. Na avaliação da lesão alvo pelo mRECIST, 16,8% dos pacientes obtiveram resposta completa e 50,9% uma resposta parcial. A doença mostrou-se estável em 19,1% e progrediu em 13,3% dos pacientes. Com relação ao grupo que usou sorafenibe, a sobrevida global foi de 10 meses, sendo de 12 meses para os pacientes Child Pugh A (50%) e de 6 meses para os pacientes Child-Pugh B (50%). Os principais efeitos colaterais foram a diarreia (60,8%) e a síndrome mão-pé (32,3%). Foi necessária a interrupção do medicamento em 45.4% dos pacientes, principalmente devido a efeitos colaterais. Conclusões: No nosso grupo, as sobrevidas médias encontradas foram bastante semelhantes à literatura, sendo maior em alguns subgrupos, como no subgrupo de pacientes que usou sorafenibe, onde a sobrevida foi melhor principalmente em relação aos pacientes classificados como Child-Pugh B, mostrando que este medicamento pode ser usado mesmo quando a doença está em estagio avançadoBackground and Aim: There are few studies about the epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its different modalities of therapy in Brazil. The lack of information about HCC in Brazil hinders the health policies related to treating new cases and preventing deaths. Our aim was to characterize HCC according to its main clinical and epidemiological aspects, treatment modalities, and outcomes after treatment in a general hospital in Brazil. Methods: We followed 326 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HCC during a 5 year period (from January 2011 to December 2015). Demographic data, characteristics of the underlying liver disease and the tumor, treatments performed and outcomes were collected. The survival was also assessed. Results: Based on Barcelona classification system, most (114) patients were classified as BCLC A on diagnosis Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was the treatment of choice in 173 (53%) patients. Systemic therapy with sorafenib was performed in 130 (40%) individuals, liver transplantation in 44 (14%), tumor resection in 26 (8%), thermo ablation in 10 (3.1%) and ethanol injection in 5 (1.5%). In 14 (5%) patients only supportive care. The median overall survival was 20 months from the date of diagnosis to the date of death or last contact. Considering the TACE group, the overall survival was 22 months. After assessing the target lesion by means of the mRECIST classification, 16.8 % of patients achieved a complete response and 50,9% a partial response. The disease stabilized in 19.1% of the patients and progressed in 13.3%. Considering the group using sorafenib, the overall survival was 10 months, being 12 months for Child-Pugh A patients (50%) and 6 months for Child Pugh B (50%) patients. The main side effects were diarrhea (60,8%) and hand-foot syndrome (32,3%). Discontinuation of the drug was necessary in 45.4% of patients, mainly due to adverse events. Conclusions: In our group, survival was better than that described in the literature. The best results were mainly due to an earlier diagnosis, justifying the importance of investment in screening and early diagnosis, for offering curative treatments. Also in the group treated with sorafenib, survival was better than that described in the literature, mainly in Child-Pugh B patients, showing that this drug should be recommended even when the disease in an advanced stag

Outcome of liver cancer patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

Background & Aims: Information about the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with liver cancer is lacking. This study characterizes the outcomes and mortality risk in this population. Methods: Multicenter retrospective, cross-sectional, international study of liver cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection registered between February-December 2020. Clinical data at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and outcomes were registered. Results: Two-hundred-fifty patients from 38 centers were included, 218 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 32 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Median age was 66.5 and 64.5 years, and 84.9% and 21.9% had cirrhosis in the HCC and iCCA cohorts, respectively. Patients had advanced cancer stage at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in 39.0% of the HCC and 71.9% of the iCCA patients. After a median follow-up of 7.20 [IQR:1.84–11.24] months, 100 (40%) patients have died,48% of the deaths were SARS-CoV-2-related. Forty (18.4%) HCC patients died within 30-days. The death rate increase was significantly different according to the BCLC stage [6.10%(95%CI 2.24–12.74), 11.76%(95%CI 4.73–22.30), 20.69%(95%CI 11.35–31.96), and 34.52%(95%CI 17.03–52.78) for BCLC 0/A, B, C and D respectively; p=0.0017]. The Hazard Ratio was 1.45 (95%CI 0.49–4.31; p=0.5032) in BCLC-B vs 0/A, and 3.13 (95%CI 1.29–7.62; p=0.0118) in BCLC-C vs 0/A in the Competing risk Cox regression model. Nineteen out of 32 iCCA (59.4%) died, 12 deaths related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusions: This is the largest cohort of liver cancer patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. It characterizes the 30-day mortality risk of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with HCC during this period

NEOTROPICAL XENARTHRANS: a data set of occurrence of xenarthran species in the Neotropics

Xenarthrans—anteaters, sloths, and armadillos—have essential functions for ecosystem maintenance, such as insect control and nutrient cycling, playing key roles as ecosystem engineers. Because of habitat loss and fragmentation, hunting pressure, and conflicts with domestic dogs, these species have been threatened locally, regionally, or even across their full distribution ranges. The Neotropics harbor 21 species of armadillos, 10 anteaters, and 6 sloths. Our data set includes the families Chlamyphoridae (13), Dasypodidae (7), Myrmecophagidae (3), Bradypodidae (4), and Megalonychidae (2). We have no occurrence data on Dasypus pilosus (Dasypodidae). Regarding Cyclopedidae, until recently, only one species was recognized, but new genetic studies have revealed that the group is represented by seven species. In this data paper, we compiled a total of 42,528 records of 31 species, represented by occurrence and quantitative data, totaling 24,847 unique georeferenced records. The geographic range is from the southern United States, Mexico, and Caribbean countries at the northern portion of the Neotropics, to the austral distribution in Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, and Uruguay. Regarding anteaters, Myrmecophaga tridactyla has the most records (n = 5,941), and Cyclopes sp. have the fewest (n = 240). The armadillo species with the most data is Dasypus novemcinctus (n = 11,588), and the fewest data are recorded for Calyptophractus retusus (n = 33). With regard to sloth species, Bradypus variegatus has the most records (n = 962), and Bradypus pygmaeus has the fewest (n = 12). Our main objective with Neotropical Xenarthrans is to make occurrence and quantitative data available to facilitate more ecological research, particularly if we integrate the xenarthran data with other data sets of Neotropical Series that will become available very soon (i.e., Neotropical Carnivores, Neotropical Invasive Mammals, and Neotropical Hunters and Dogs). Therefore, studies on trophic cascades, hunting pressure, habitat loss, fragmentation effects, species invasion, and climate change effects will be possible with the Neotropical Xenarthrans data set. Please cite this data paper when using its data in publications. We also request that researchers and teachers inform us of how they are using these data

Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network

International audienceThe shortage of reliable primary taxonomic data limits the description of biological taxa and the understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes, complicating biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary studies. This deficit creates a significant taxonomic impediment to biodiversity research and conservation planning. The taxonomic impediment and the biodiversity crisis are widely recognized, highlighting the urgent need for reliable taxonomic data. Over the past decade, numerous countries worldwide have devoted considerable effort to Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), which called for the preparation of a working list of all known plant species by 2010 and an online world Flora by 2020. Brazil is a megadiverse country, home to more of the world's known plant species than any other country. Despite that, Flora Brasiliensis, concluded in 1906, was the last comprehensive treatment of the Brazilian flora. The lack of accurate estimates of the number of species of algae, fungi, and plants occurring in Brazil contributes to the prevailing taxonomic impediment and delays progress towards the GSPC targets. Over the past 12 years, a legion of taxonomists motivated to meet Target 1 of the GSPC, worked together to gather and integrate knowledge on the algal, plant, and fungal diversity of Brazil. Overall, a team of about 980 taxonomists joined efforts in a highly collaborative project that used cybertaxonomy to prepare an updated Flora of Brazil, showing the power of scientific collaboration to reach ambitious goals. This paper presents an overview of the Brazilian Flora 2020 and provides taxonomic and spatial updates on the algae, fungi, and plants found in one of the world's most biodiverse countries. We further identify collection gaps and summarize future goals that extend beyond 2020. Our results show that Brazil is home to 46,975 native species of algae, fungi, and plants, of which 19,669 are endemic to the country. The data compiled to date suggests that the Atlantic Rainforest might be the most diverse Brazilian domain for all plant groups except gymnosperms, which are most diverse in the Amazon. However, scientific knowledge of Brazilian diversity is still unequally distributed, with the Atlantic Rainforest and the Cerrado being the most intensively sampled and studied biomes in the country. In times of “scientific reductionism”, with botanical and mycological sciences suffering pervasive depreciation in recent decades, the first online Flora of Brazil 2020 significantly enhanced the quality and quantity of taxonomic data available for algae, fungi, and plants from Brazil. This project also made all the information freely available online, providing a firm foundation for future research and for the management, conservation, and sustainable use of the Brazilian funga and flora

NEOTROPICAL ALIEN MAMMALS: a data set of occurrence and abundance of alien mammals in the Neotropics

Biological invasion is one of the main threats to native biodiversity. For a species to become invasive, it must be voluntarily or involuntarily introduced by humans into a nonnative habitat. Mammals were among first taxa to be introduced worldwide for game, meat, and labor, yet the number of species introduced in the Neotropics remains unknown. In this data set, we make available occurrence and abundance data on mammal species that (1) transposed a geographical barrier and (2) were voluntarily or involuntarily introduced by humans into the Neotropics. Our data set is composed of 73,738 historical and current georeferenced records on alien mammal species of which around 96% correspond to occurrence data on 77 species belonging to eight orders and 26 families. Data cover 26 continental countries in the Neotropics, ranging from Mexico and its frontier regions (southern Florida and coastal-central Florida in the southeast United States) to Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, and Uruguay, and the 13 countries of Caribbean islands. Our data set also includes neotropical species (e.g., Callithrix sp., Myocastor coypus, Nasua nasua) considered alien in particular areas of Neotropics. The most numerous species in terms of records are from Bos sp. (n = 37,782), Sus scrofa (n = 6,730), and Canis familiaris (n = 10,084); 17 species were represented by only one record (e.g., Syncerus caffer, Cervus timorensis, Cervus unicolor, Canis latrans). Primates have the highest number of species in the data set (n = 20 species), partly because of uncertainties regarding taxonomic identification of the genera Callithrix, which includes the species Callithrix aurita, Callithrix flaviceps, Callithrix geoffroyi, Callithrix jacchus, Callithrix kuhlii, Callithrix penicillata, and their hybrids. This unique data set will be a valuable source of information on invasion risk assessments, biodiversity redistribution and conservation-related research. There are no copyright restrictions. Please cite this data paper when using the data in publications. We also request that researchers and teachers inform us on how they are using the data